RYANOHH.COM

February 23, 2010

Women You Need In Your Life: Part 3.

Gaby Hoffmann

Gaby-Hoffmann-3223-165

Gaby Hoffmann is one of my favorite indie babes. She was a major child actor, starring in films like Uncle Buck and Now & Then and she boasts some serious genes. Her mother is the famous Factory girl, Viva, and she was raised in the Chelsea Hotel during its drug-addled heyday. Once puberty hit, Hoffmann peaced out of the industry and reemerged only on occasion to star in flicks like 200 Cigarettes and You Can Count On Me. Unlike most child actors, Hoffmann’s future didn’t involve drug addiction and starring roles in Lifetime  movies. She went to college. Bard, to be exact, where she presumably smoked a lot of pot, made out with boys named Teal, and listened to a shitload of Grizzly Bear. Since she’s graduated, she’s started to film movies again and do photo shoots for Interview. WELCOME BACK, MY LIL ALTERNATIVE PRINCESS.

Dominique Swain

dominique_swain_1-1

Liking Dominique Swain is kind of embarrassing. She stars in twenty B-movies a year with actors like Tom Sizemore and Brad Renfro (when he was alive obvi). Her lackluster career is admittedly deserved as she has no discernible talent. But….there’s something about her. She broke out in the 90s remake of Lolita and did a pretty good job at making inappropriate eyes at Jeremy Irons. She then went on to even star in the big-budget film, Face/Off. Things looked promising. But somewhere along the way, she got lost in largely-unseen personal guilty pleasures of mine such as Girl, New Best Friend, Tart and Happy Campers. She recently made an attempt at the mainstream by nabbing a small part in Alpha Dog but alas, I would say that it was all for naught. Why? Because in her last film, she co-starred with Carly Pope as a woman named Mindy Danger

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 8:05 pm

February 19, 2010

Bravo, Bravo!

Reality shows generally operate under the same formula: take an uneducated blow-up doll and give them their own soapbox. On this soapbox, this uneducated person will undoubtedly say horribly stupid things and we, the viewers, can laugh at their ignorance and in turn feel better about ourselves. It’s not rocket science. It’s reality TV.
But in recent years, Bravo has given the reality television genre a much-needed makeover. For starters, they’ve veered away from the usual reality show target i.e. a twenty-something and have graciously given the spotlight to middle-aged men and women. Genius and largely unprecedented. Secondly, reality shows main focus is to propel relative unknowns into reality TV stardom. Their focus is to get people exposure based on a reality show, not any kind of legitimate career. This totally sucks because it gives unecessary fame to gross people like Paris Hilton, the girls of The Hills, Kim Kardashian and Tila Tequila.
Bravo flips that around and bases their shows around a professional whose career is already established (Millionaire Matchmaker, Kell On Earth, Flipping Out). These people are successful, rich, articulate and quirky. They’re doing their reality show not to gain infamy but as a way to boost business and feed their ego. This goes against what many people believe to be what reality TV is all about: making dumb people famous for nothing outside of doing their own reality show. Their “reality”, by the way, is largely indebted to their reality show. When Kim Kardashian is filmed doing a swimsuit shoot on Keeping Up With The Kardashian, it’s safe to assume that she landed said shoot based on the exposure and high ratings of her show. Without it, the only thing Kim Kardashian would be booking is starring roles in her own sex tape.
Obviously, Bravo isn’t perfect (Nor should they be.)  The Real Housewives franchise, for example,  is built around entitled narcissitic rich people of little redeemable intelligence. (Exception being the New York cast. Jill Zarin and Bethenny Frankel aren’t stupid.) Like Paris & Kim K., many of the Real Housewives have parlayed their reality show fame into record deals and clothing lines.
But Bravo shows are smart. They’re edited brilliantly.
The Real Housewives of Orange County could’ve been produced as simplisitic, light and frothy.  The message could’ve been just like the other reality shows that feature oppulent lifestyles: “Rich people are undeserving of their wealth and awful people.” And granted,  it is like that sometimes. But it’s mostly just really depressing brilliant social commentary. These women are fucked up and sad. Seriously, if I had their lives, I would keep a camera crew far away. They expose so much of themselves that it can be almost uncomfortable to watch. It’s compelling stuff. You almost empathize with them. And that’s what Bravo wants you to feel, that’s their point-of-view.
Kelly Cutrone is so brilliant, she gives me chills. Her perceptive behavior towards fashion culture is so spot-on and refreshing. It’s like she’s this outsider that was given a VIP pass to this insane other world. It’s the antidote to the equally-entertaining Rachel Zoe Project. Unlike Rachel Zoe, Kelly Cutrone acknowledges the ridiculousness of fashion designers and her job. Does that mean she’s not gonna flip her shit over something as silly as a misplaced guest list? No but at least she’ll have some perspective while doing it.

Reality shows generally operate under the same formula: take an All-American guy/gal and give them their own soapbox. On this soapbox, he/she will undoubtedly say horribly stupid things that will make we, the viewers, laugh at their ignorance and in turn feel better about ourselves. It’s not rocket science. It’s reality TV.

But in recent years, Bravo has given the reality television genre a much-needed makeover. For starters, they’ve veered away from the usual reality show target i.e. a twenty-something and have graciously given the spotlight to middle-aged men and women. Genius and largely unprecedented. Secondly, reality shows’ main focus is to propel relative unknowns into the kind of stardom that lands you on covers of Us Weekly talking about how you lost the baby weight.

Bravo flips that around and bases their shows around a professional whose career is already established (Millionaire Matchmaker, Kell On Earth, Flipping Out). These people are successful, rich, articulate and quirky. They’re doing their reality show not to gain infamy but as a way to boost business and feed their ego. This goes against what many people believe to be what reality TV is all about: making uneducated people famous for nothing outside of doing their own reality show, people whose “reality” is largely informed by the success of their show. When Kim Kardashian is filmed doing a swimsuit shoot on Keeping Up With The Kardashians, it’s safe to assume that she landed said shoot based on the exposure and high ratings of her show. Without it, the only thing Kim Kardashian would be booking is starring roles in her own sex tape.

Obviously, Bravo doesn’t subscribe to these rules exclusively.  The Real Housewives franchise, for example,  is built around entitled narcissitic rich people of little redeemable intelligence. (Exception being the New York cast. Jill Zarin and Bethenny Frankel aren’t stupid.) Like Paris & Kim K., many of the Real Housewives have parlayed their reality show fame into record deals and clothing lines.

But Bravo shows are smart. They’re edited with a knowing intelligent point-of-view.

real-housewives-of-orange-county-season-5-photos

The Real Housewives of Orange County could’ve been produced as simplisitic, light and frothy.  The message could’ve echoed the sentiments of other reality shows that feature oppulent lifestyles: “Rich people are undeserving of their wealth and are awful people.” And granted,  it is like that sometimes. But it’s mostly just really depressing brilliant social commentary. These women are fucked up and sad. Seriously, if I had their lives, I would keep a camera crew far away. They expose so much of themselves that it can be almost uncomfortable to watch. It’s compelling stuff and you almost empathize with them. That’s what Bravo wants you to feel, that’s their agenda.

kell-on-earth

Kell On Earth is heaven on earth. Kelly Cutrone is so whip-smart, she gives me chills. Her perceptive behavior towards fashion culture is spot-on and refreshing. It’s like she’s this outsider that was given a VIP pass to this insane other world. It’s the antidote to the equally-entertaining Rachel Zoe Project. Unlike Rachel Zoe, Kelly Cutrone has a level of self-awareness and acknowledges the ridiculousness of fashion designers and her job. Does that mean she’s not gonna flip her shit over something as silly as a misplaced guest list? No but at least she’ll have some perspective while doing it.

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 1:57 am

February 15, 2010

It’s safer than playing Russian Roulette. You just lose your dignity.

Who wants to play a game with us?

Who wants to play a game with us?

I was introduced to the website, Chat Roulette, today and I fear that my virtual life will never be the same. It’s a self-professed “service for one-on-one text-, webcam- and microphone -based chat with people around the world.” What that loosely translates to is “a website where you can video chat with sexual deviants, 12 year-olds and lonely old people from anywhere in the world.” The concept is so simple and yet so compelling. If I wanted to (and I usually do apparently), I could go on Chat Roulette right now and video chat with some guy masturbating. I could laugh awkwardly, send him lurid messages and by the time I felt any shame, I could “next” him and move on to the next person. This website works on so many levels. For starters, it’s the “unknown” factor that is perhaps so intriguing about the site. You have no idea who you’re going to meet. Most of the time, it’s the stereotypical creeper; an oversexed frat boy drooling at the possibility of seeing teen flesh or an overweight balding man offending you with his ugly throbbing cock. But some of the time, you’ll come across like-minded individuals who will share in your disgust over the undesirable men and women showing skin.

But if anyone claims to be repulsed by the dirty things they’re seeing, they’d be lying and/or missing the point of the site entirely. As willing participants, we want to see the big fat guy in bondage so we can laugh about it with our friends on camera and have the satisfaction of feeling “normal.” However, us “normals” are the ones getting titillated by the site’s obscenity and coming back for more. It taps into our voyeuristic and curious side, a side that I thought had been already thoroughly exploited by the internet but obviously not enough.

The website also reminds me of that insane MTV dating show, Next. The one where a gaggle of twenty-somethings hang out on a bus. Each person gets sent out to go on a low-budget date with some stupid loser from Orange County and runs the risk of getting axed or “nexted” if they  aren’t to their date’s liking. It’s so demeaning because people are often “nexted” on the spot, based on their physical appearance. Chat Roulette works in a similar way (hence, the “roulette” I suppose).  If someone doesn’t look appealing to you in the first 2.5 seconds of a chat, you can immediately “Next” them and be sent to another random stranger. Meanwhile, the spurned folk are left to sit back and wonder, “What was so offensive about me that made you want to end the chat before it began?”  In the words of Cher Horrowitz, “That’s way harsh, Tai.”

The site also lends further credence to my theory that all these social-network sites have kept us more connected on a superficial level with one another. However, when it comes to creating any substantive bonds, they’ve made us so socially inept and alienated that we would rather spend our Saturday afternoons watching a stranger from Brazil masturbate into a cup than meet an old friend for coffee.

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 3:59 am

February 12, 2010

Barcelona Lifestyles.

00322812_

mom

goodman

Spanish-men-benidorm.JPG

nutella400_250

giant-drag4

As it turns out, my life in Europe is very similar to the one I lead in America. Only difference being that I’m now inexplicably addicted to Nutella and have a lowered tolerance to cured ham and cheese sandwiches.

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 8:00 pm

February 8, 2010

This is weird.

The Sudance Channel interviewed me about my style. I was super hungover and chasing after drunk Santas at Santacon when they “spotted” me.

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 11:40 am

$$$/ART.

9780066211312

I’m in the middle of reading Patti Smith’s memoir, Just Kids, and it’s raised some interesting questions for me. Before buying the book, I had the most rudimentary knowledge of both Patti Smith & Robert Maplethorpe. I knew that Patti Smith was a cult rocker who made the seminal rock album, Horses. And I was aware of Robert Maplethorpe’s revered status as a homo-erotic photographer. But beyond that, my knowledge was limited.

An interview with Patti Smith in (what else?) this month’s Interview implored me to read the book. In the article, she talks about the gentrification of New York City and the correlation between poverty and life as an artist. Normally, I would roll my eyes at such tired topics but Smith’s eloquence struck me. The book, so far, is interesting. It definitely romanticizes life in the “old” New York, living hand-to-mouth but making beautiful art with your cute creative friends. It’s kind of all the old cliches about artists rolled into one memoir but for some reason, it matters more coming from Patti Smith’s mouth. Maybe because she has the talent (musically at least) to back up her words.And it gets me thinking about the relationship between money and art. In the 70′s, I feel like it was almost necessary for an artist to come from a rough impoverished background. It gave them the tragedy that would be deemed necessary to fuel “great art.” But I’ve always had a problem with the idea of a starving artist. Why can’t an artist eat caviar instead of canned beans?  An artist’s upbringing plays a pivotal role in their work. It acts as their point of reference, it’s what they know. But why is one upbringing more valid than the other?

But then I think of today’s new artists and I see a definite change. Photographers like Ryan McGinley and Jack Seigel certainly don’t seem starving. Quite the opposite, they appear always well-groomed, fashionable and as attractive as their subjects. And for some reason, this bothers me as much as the concept of the starving artist. Maybe its fear of nepotism, an easy ride, whatever. I feel like the bougie socialite, the person that picks up a Holga camera during their photography class at Crossroads High School, is the new modern artist/photographer. These kids also have a strong relationship to the internet and post photos taken on their expensive cameras of their jaunts to Europe, party photography, etc. Robert Maplethorpe didn’t have access to the internet and if he did, he sure wouldn’t post pictures of his nights at Misshapes. Or maybe he actually would.

This rant has no real cohesion. No concrete conclusion. And I normally loathe talking about things of this nature but I just Youtubed so many episodes of Autopsy Presents, ate so much Nutella and I can’t sleep. So there you have it.

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 11:36 am

February 6, 2010

Jet Lag Hag & Why Do Spanish People Put Tuna in Everything?

I’ve been in Barcelona for five days and I’ve decided that it’s been enough time for me to begin making sweeping generalizations about the city, its residents and culture. Before I go into detail though, I want to tell you that its an amazing place and life in Europe is going swimmingly. That being said, there are some things that have stood out for me about Barcelona and the traveling experience over all.

1. Jet Lag

Having done the New York/LA trip countless times, I’ve experienced slivers of jet lag. Unfortunately, flying to Europe is a different kind of beast and it feels like a cruel painful joke is being played on your body. My traveling companion, Caitie, and I took a red eye from New Jerz to Barcelona. We looked like this after the flight:

Photo on 2010-02-02 at 03.58 #3

I blame this on my foolish decision to take an Ambien on the flight. When taking Ambien, I’ve learned that you have to close your eyes immediately after ingesting the pill. After five minutes or so, you’ll be unconscious. If you stay awake, however, you begin to hallucinate koala bears or whatever the fuck is in your subconscious and things start to get real weird. Thankfully, the latter has only occurred once so I had great faith in the Ambien’s ability to knock me out in time for the flight-in movie. So I took it and closed my eyes. After about ten minutes, I started shuffling around and changing positions. After another ten minutes, I was still awake,  frustrated and gave up on the idea of sleeping. At the time, I thought I was fine and was actually pleasantly surprised at how normal I was feeling. After arriving in Barcelona, however, Caitie informed me that I was singing a Pink song, thinking it was playing on the airplane and smashing my rice with my napkin repeatedly. Needless to say, I didn’t get much shut eye. The day we arrived, Caitie and I were in a trance. We took a 3 hour nap and later fell asleep at midnight. After waking up at ten am and doing some exploring, we came back to our apartment and slept from 4 to 8. Oops. I didn’t end up falling back asleep till six am. I think we’re pretty okay now. Except we’ve been going out till five am and sleeping till 3. And Caitie is napping as I type this.

2. The food

Truth: Some of the best Thai food I’ve ever had was at a restaurant in Barcelona. It’s a shameful and surprising secret. One day, Caitie and I were nursing a medium-grade hangover and stumbled upon this ornate lush place called Thai Gardens. Our heads were saying “tapas” but our hearts were saying “pad thai”. Speaking of tapas, they’re totally weird. Turnip and tuna? No, k bye. Paella is life-altering though.

3. Nightlife

Europe is literally turning me into a Gothic vampire because all we’ve been doing is going out till the wee hours of the morning, sleeping in til mid-afternoon, schlepping our hungover asses to a museum, going home to cook dinner and getting ready to go out again. But it’s worth it because the nightlife is incomparable. Our first night out, we went to an ingeniously-named bar called, Betty Ford, which housed a mixture of foreign babes and local babes whilst serving insanely potent cocktails. The next night, we went to this placed called Mau Mau (Caitie and I called it “Meow meow” because it sounded funny even though it actually doesn’t) which showed short films to Spaniards sitting in IKEA couches. Afterwards, we went to this bar called Bodega something or other that served the most delicious Mojitos. Other bars we’ve frequented have been: The Gimlet and Seven Sins. We want to go to Razzmatazz, a huge club that;s open till six in the morning and also to some gay bars. Unless a Spanish man is in a gay bar, I will assume he’s straight because European men are way too ambiguous.

To meet people, we’ve been using this website, Couch Surfing. I was initially resistant to the idea, for fear that it would only attract hippy-dippy types and serial killers but we’ve been meeting amazing people. Who knew the internet was good for more than checking celebrity gossip and writing in your own narcissistic travel blog?

Share
Filed under: Uncategorized — @ 8:26 pm

© RYAN OCONNELL 2010 | SITE DESIGN BY CAILTIN ROLLS